On 27.05.2022 10:57, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 10:05 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> It's pretty clear that the operand numbers in the MEM_P() checks are
>> off by one, perhaps due to a copy-and-paste oversight (unlike in most
>> other places here we're dealing with two outputs).
>>
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 10:05 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> It's pretty clear that the operand numbers in the MEM_P() checks are
> off by one, perhaps due to a copy-and-paste oversight (unlike in most
> other places here we're dealing with two outputs).
> ---
> What I don't understand is why operand 2
It's pretty clear that the operand numbers in the MEM_P() checks are
off by one, perhaps due to a copy-and-paste oversight (unlike in most
other places here we're dealing with two outputs).
---
What I don't understand is why operand 2 is "nonimmediate_operand", not
"register_operand" (which afaict
