On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 5:56 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> Don't use implicit shift count in double-precision shifts in AT&T syntax
> since they aren't in Intel SDM. Keep the 's' modifier for backward
> compatibility with inline asm statements.
>
> PR target/114590
> * config/i386/i386.md
Don't use implicit shift count in double-precision shifts in AT&T syntax
since they aren't in Intel SDM. Keep the 's' modifier for backward
compatibility with inline asm statements.
PR target/114590
* config/i386/i386.md (x86_64_shld): Use explicit shift count in
AT&T synt
