On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:48:28PM +0800, Wei Xiao wrote:
> The original runtime testcases are incorrect and I have fixed them as
> attached.
> Is it ok to do the revert and fix the testcases for trunk?
LGTM.
> 2019-01-16 Wei Xiao
>
> * gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vfixupimmpd-2.c: Fix th
The original runtime testcases are incorrect and I have fixed them as attached.
Is it ok to do the revert and fix the testcases for trunk?
Wei
2019-01-16 Wei Xiao
* gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vfixupimmpd-2.c: Fix the test cases for
VFIXUPIMM* intrinsics.
* gcc.target/i386
> > Yes, but please test the compiler after the revert. Please also create
> > a runtime testcase out of the testcase in the PR.
Yes, we have tested it but current runtime testcase can't cover the corner
case to expose the incorrectness of SDM. We will add some after the revert.
> For r267160, I'd
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 04:14:06PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 3:40 PM Wei Xiao wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It turns out that the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer
> > Manuals (SDM) description about the fixupimm intrinsic is incorrect. So we
> > need
> >
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 3:40 PM Wei Xiao wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It turns out that the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer
> Manuals (SDM) description about the fixupimm intrinsic is incorrect. So we
> need
> to revert 3 patches related to it: r265827, r266026 and r267160.
> Sorry for
Hi,
It turns out that the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer
Manuals (SDM) description about the fixupimm intrinsic is incorrect. So we need
to revert 3 patches related to it: r265827, r266026 and r267160.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Is it ok?
Wei
