On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 1:03 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:59:16PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > > So yes, a better solution would be nice but I can't see any since the
> > > > > underlying issue is known since a long time and thus the pragmatic
> > > > > solution i
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:59:16PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > So yes, a better solution would be nice but I can't see any since the
> > > > underlying issue is known since a long time and thus the pragmatic
> > > > solution is the best (IMHO), also from a QOI perspective. For
> > > > in
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:14 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 6:24 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 5:09 AM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:26 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:13:21AM +0100, Ri
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 6:24 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 5:09 AM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:26 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:13:21AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 9:34 AM Jakub Jelin
> So yes, a better solution would be nice but I can't see any since the
> underlying issue is known since a long time and thus the pragmatic
> solution is the best (IMHO), also from a QOI perspective. For intrinsics
> it also avoids differences with -O0 vs -O with what we accept