On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 11:25:34AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> We can use 'q' modifier just before register output part (plus a small
>> simplification).
>>
>> Can you try the attached (untested) patch?
>>
>> Uros.
>
>> Index: i386.c
>>
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 11:25:34AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> We can use 'q' modifier just before register output part (plus a small
> simplification).
>
> Can you try the attached (untested) patch?
>
> Uros.
> Index: i386.c
> ===
On 9/24/17, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 11:16 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> Since the upper 32 bits of stack register are always zero for x32, we
>> can encode %esp as %rsp to avoid 0x67 prefix in address if there is no
>> index or base register.
>>
>> Tested on x86-64. OK for trunk?
>>
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 11:16 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Since the upper 32 bits of stack register are always zero for x32, we
> can encode %esp as %rsp to avoid 0x67 prefix in address if there is no
> index or base register.
>
> Tested on x86-64. OK for trunk?
>
> H.J.
>
> gcc/
>
> PR tar
Since the upper 32 bits of stack register are always zero for x32, we
can encode %esp as %rsp to avoid 0x67 prefix in address if there is no
index or base register.
Tested on x86-64. OK for trunk?
H.J.
gcc/
PR target/82267
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_print_operand_address_as
