Hi Alex,
> It might be nice to at least experiment with supporting DRs with
> different steps as follow-on work. I agree that we should leave it out
> for the first version to keep things simple.
> FWIW, in case it's of interest, I wrote a script to calculate the
> possible combinations of align
Hi Pengfei,
This looks really good, I've just left a couple of small comments below.
On 06/06/2025 14:35, Pengfei Li wrote:
> Current GCC uses either peeling or versioning, but not in combination,
> to handle unaligned data references (DRs) during vectorization. This
> limitation causes some loop
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025, Pengfei Li wrote:
> Current GCC uses either peeling or versioning, but not in combination,
> to handle unaligned data references (DRs) during vectorization. This
> limitation causes some loops with early break to fall back to scalar
> code at runtime.
>
> Consider the followin
Current GCC uses either peeling or versioning, but not in combination,
to handle unaligned data references (DRs) during vectorization. This
limitation causes some loops with early break to fall back to scalar
code at runtime.
Consider the following loop with DRs in its early break condition:
