sday, May 29, 2024 3:14 PM
> To: Feng Xue OS
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] vect: Unify bbs in loop_vec_info and bb_vec_info
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 6:11 PM Feng Xue OS
> wrote:
> >
> > Because bbs of loop_vec_info need to be allo
Ok. Then I will add a TODO comment on "bbs" field to describe it.
Thanks,
Feng
From: Richard Biener
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2024 3:14 PM
To: Feng Xue OS
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vect: Unify bbs in loop_vec_info and b
. */
> + unsigned int nbbs;
> +
> private:
>stmt_vec_info new_stmt_vec_info (gimple *stmt);
>void set_vinfo_for_stmt (gimple *, stmt_vec_info, bool = true);
> @@ -679,9 +685,6 @@ public:
>/* The loop to which this info struct refers to. */
>class loop *loop;
*bb_vec_info;
-#define BB_VINFO_BB(B) (B)->bb
+#define BB_VINFO_BBS(B) (B)->bbs
+#define BB_VINFO_NBBS(B) (B)->nbbs
#define BB_VINFO_GROUPED_STORES(B) (B)->grouped_stores
#define BB_VINFO_SLP_INSTANCES(B)(B)->slp_instances
#defin
On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 4:54 PM Feng Xue OS wrote:
>
> Both derived classes ( loop_vec_info/bb_vec_info) have their own "bbs"
> field, which have exactly same purpose of recording all basic blocks
> inside the corresponding vect region, while the fields are composed by
> different data type, one i
Both derived classes ( loop_vec_info/bb_vec_info) have their own "bbs"
field, which have exactly same purpose of recording all basic blocks
inside the corresponding vect region, while the fields are composed by
different data type, one is normal array, the other is auto_vec. This
difference causes
