On 4/3/25 8:40 AM, Victor Do Nascimento wrote:
Cheers,
And given how the test also started failing for GCC14, are we also okay
to go ahead with backporting the patch?
Of course.
Thanks,
jeff
Cheers,
And given how the test also started failing for GCC14, are we also okay
to go ahead with backporting the patch?
Victor
On 4/2/25 17:39, Jeff Law wrote:
On 4/2/25 8:53 AM, Victor Do Nascimento wrote:
Using specific SSA names in pattern matching in `dg-final' makes tests
"unstable", i
On 4/2/25 8:53 AM, Victor Do Nascimento wrote:
Using specific SSA names in pattern matching in `dg-final' makes tests
"unstable", in that changes in passes prior to the pass whose dump is
analyzed in the particular test may change the numbering of the SSA
variables, causing the test to start f
Using specific SSA names in pattern matching in `dg-final' makes tests
"unstable", in that changes in passes prior to the pass whose dump is
analyzed in the particular test may change the numbering of the SSA
variables, causing the test to start failing spuriously.
We thus switch from specific SSA
