On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 12:52 PM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 2:39 PM Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> For the following test case (compiled with load/store lanes
> >> disabled locally):
> >>
> >> void
> >> f (uint32_t
Richard Biener writes:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 2:39 PM Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>> For the following test case (compiled with load/store lanes
>> disabled locally):
>>
>> void
>> f (uint32_t *restrict x, uint8_t *restrict y, int n)
>> {
>> for (int i = 0; i < n; +
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 2:39 PM Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> For the following test case (compiled with load/store lanes
> disabled locally):
>
> void
> f (uint32_t *restrict x, uint8_t *restrict y, int n)
> {
> for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
> {
> x[i * 2] = x
For the following test case (compiled with load/store lanes
disabled locally):
void
f (uint32_t *restrict x, uint8_t *restrict y, int n)
{
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
{
x[i * 2] = x[i * 2] + y[i * 2];
x[i * 2 + 1] = x[i * 2 + 1] + y[i * 2];
}
}
we have a re
