Re: [PATCH] var-tracking: Mark as sp based more VALUEs [PR92264]

2020-03-25 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On Fri, 2020-03-20 at 11:04 +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > Hi! > > With this simple patch, on i686-linux and x86_64-linux with -m32 (no change > for -m64), the find_base_term visited_vals.length () > 100 find_base_term > statistics changed (fbt is before this patch, fbt2 with this p

Re: [PATCH] var-tracking: Mark as sp based more VALUEs [PR92264]

2020-03-20 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > With this simple patch, on i686-linux and x86_64-linux with -m32 (no change > for -m64), the find_base_term visited_vals.length () > 100 find_base_term > statistics changed (fbt is before this patch, fbt2 with this patch): > for k in '' '1$'; do

[PATCH] var-tracking: Mark as sp based more VALUEs [PR92264]

2020-03-20 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
Hi! With this simple patch, on i686-linux and x86_64-linux with -m32 (no change for -m64), the find_base_term visited_vals.length () > 100 find_base_term statistics changed (fbt is before this patch, fbt2 with this patch): for k in '' '1$'; do for i in 32 64; do for j in fbt fbt2; do \ echo -n "$j