On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> It must've been whitespace then. Your new patch applied just fine.
> I'll be committing shortly.
Committed at r204301.
Diego.
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
>> The patch is OK, but it did not completely apply in my tree. Mind
>> sending an updated version (or point me at a git repo I can pull it
>> from).
>
> interesting, I just pulled and rebased it onto r204296 without any manual
> merging. Pat
27;t tested it
against that rev yet).
Trev
>
>
> Thanks. Diego.
>From 3e9b030811d3ff4f5605227171d33561ce59453e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Trevor Saunders
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:19:29 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] use stack vectors more
---
gcc/cp/semantics.c
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:48 PM, wrote:
> From: Trevor Saunders
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch is pretty dull, it just replaces a bunch of things of the form
> vec x;
> x.create (N); // N is a constant
> blah blah
> x.release ();
> by
> stack_vec x;
> blah blah
>
> Of course its even nicer than that in
From: Trevor Saunders
Hi,
This patch is pretty dull, it just replaces a bunch of things of the form
vec x;
x.create (N); // N is a constant
blah blah
x.release ();
by
stack_vec x;
blah blah
Of course its even nicer than that in some of the cases with many early returns.
bootstrapped and same t
