On 10/28/19 4:44 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/28/19 4:36 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
While testing the patch for PR 92226 I posted earlier today
I ran into a few cases where I expected the strlen range
optimization to take place but it didn't.
In other instances this wouldn't be surprising because
the
On 10/28/19 4:36 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> While testing the patch for PR 92226 I posted earlier today
> I ran into a few cases where I expected the strlen range
> optimization to take place but it didn't.
>
> In other instances this wouldn't be surprising because
> the optimization was only intro
While testing the patch for PR 92226 I posted earlier today
I ran into a few cases where I expected the strlen range
optimization to take place but it didn't.
In other instances this wouldn't be surprising because
the optimization was only introduced for multi-character stores
and with the expect