On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Hi,
> Due to the way bit-field access lower is done, we can get an
> unitialized memory load and this causes the unitialized warning to
> kick in.
> The case we have is:
> temp_1 = BIT_FIELD_REF
> temp_2 = BIT_INSERT
> BIT_FIELD_REF = temp_
Hi,
Due to the way bit-field access lower is done, we can get an
unitialized memory load and this causes the unitialized warning to
kick in.
The case we have is:
temp_1 = BIT_FIELD_REF
temp_2 = BIT_INSERT
BIT_FIELD_REF = temp_2
What this patch does is similar to what was done for the case of
BIT
