> Am 02.07.2023 um 16:54 schrieb Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
> :
>
> Hi!
>
> The match_uaddc_usubc matching doesn't require that the second
> .{ADD,SUB}_OVERFLOW has REALPART_EXPR of its lhs used, only that there is
> at most one. So, in the weird case where the REALPART_EXPR of it isn't
Hi!
The match_uaddc_usubc matching doesn't require that the second
.{ADD,SUB}_OVERFLOW has REALPART_EXPR of its lhs used, only that there is
at most one. So, in the weird case where the REALPART_EXPR of it isn't
present, we shouldn't ICE trying to replace that REALPART_EXPR with
REALPART_EXPR of
