On Mon, 4 Jul 2022, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 04 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Jul 2022, Martin Jambor wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> As the testcase in PR 105860 shows, the code that tries to re-use the
> >> handled_component chains in SRA can be horribly confused by
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 04 2022, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2022, Martin Jambor wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As the testcase in PR 105860 shows, the code that tries to re-use the
>> handled_component chains in SRA can be horribly confused by unions,
>> where it thinks it has found a compatible struct
On Fri, 1 Jul 2022, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As the testcase in PR 105860 shows, the code that tries to re-use the
> handled_component chains in SRA can be horribly confused by unions,
> where it thinks it has found a compatible structure under which it can
> chain the references, but in fa
Hi,
As the testcase in PR 105860 shows, the code that tries to re-use the
handled_component chains in SRA can be horribly confused by unions,
where it thinks it has found a compatible structure under which it can
chain the references, but in fact it found the type it was looking
for elsewhere in a
