On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> This fixes the validity check for redundant store removal by looking
> at the actual stmt that represents the last (relevant) change to
> the TBAA state rather than the imperfectly tracked alias set in the
> expression hash table which then becomes u
This fixes the validity check for redundant store removal by looking
at the actual stmt that represents the last (relevant) change to
the TBAA state rather than the imperfectly tracked alias set in the
expression hash table which then becomes unused (see a followup change
to get rid of that).
On