On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 7:41 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>
> On 1/19/22 04:33, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 2:37 AM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> OK for trunk?
> > OK. I don't quite understand how what you describe above works, it sounds
> > a bit odd with
On 1/19/22 04:33, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 2:37 AM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches
wrote:
OK for trunk?
OK. I don't quite understand how what you describe above works, it sounds
a bit odd with respect to the idea that equivalences should be transitive but
The transitive c
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 2:37 AM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> This patch happens to fix the PR, but I believe it only papers over a
> deeper issue that is uncovered in PR104067.
>
> That said, examination of the issue uncovered an oversight in the way
> equivalence sets are merged by t
This patch happens to fix the PR, but I believe it only papers over a
deeper issue that is uncovered in PR104067.
That said, examination of the issue uncovered an oversight in the way
equivalence sets are merged by the equivalence oracle. I have not seen
an instance via the ranger, but I susp
