On Mon, 26 Jul 2021, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >> Sorry, somehow I didn't see Richard's reply. Perhaps a
> >> misconfiguration
> >> on my mail server.
>
> I don't know where the problem lies, but for some reason I've been
> getting rejects when sending messages directly (via reply-all).
Somet
Xi Ruoyao writes:
> On Fri, 2021-07-23 at 11:18 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
>> On Fri, 2021-07-23 at 04:21 +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>> > On Fri, 9 Jul 2021, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > > > The "smallest fix" is simply adding -fno-inline into
>> > > > > > > mips.exp
On Fri, 2021-07-23 at 11:18 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-07-23 at 04:21 +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Jul 2021, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > The "smallest fix" is simply adding -fno-inline into
> > > > > > > mips.exp.
> > > > > > > However
>
On Fri, 2021-07-23 at 04:21 +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jul 2021, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > > > > > The "smallest fix" is simply adding -fno-inline into
> > > > > > mips.exp.
> > > > > > However
> > > > > > I don't like it because I agree with you that mips.ex
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >> > > The "smallest fix" is simply adding -fno-inline into mips.exp.
> >> > > However
> >> > > I don't like it because I agree with you that mips.exp shouldn't
> >> > > care
> >> > > about dg-options, at least don't do it too much.
>
Xi Ruoyao writes:
> On Thu, 2021-07-08 at 17:44 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/25/2021 8:40 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> > Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches writes:
>> > > On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 01:02 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
>> > > > On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 10:48 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> > > > >
On Thu, 2021-07-08 at 17:44 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 6/25/2021 8:40 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches writes:
> > > On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 01:02 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 10:48 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > > > I'd like to know a bit more
On 6/25/2021 8:40 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches writes:
On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 01:02 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 10:48 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
I'd like to know a bit more here. mips.exp shouldn't care about the
options passed to the compiler and to
Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches writes:
> On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 01:02 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
>> On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 10:48 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> > I'd like to know a bit more here. mips.exp shouldn't care about the
>> > options passed to the compiler and to the best of my knowledge
>> > patch it
On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 01:02 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 10:48 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > I'd like to know a bit more here. mips.exp shouldn't care about the
> > options passed to the compiler and to the best of my knowledge
> > patch itself is wrong, I question if it's necessa
Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches writes:
> On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 10:48 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/22/2021 1:05 AM, Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> > mips.exp does not support -fno-inline, causing the tests return
>> > "ERROR:
>> > Unrecognised option: -fno-inline for dg-options ... ".
>>
On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 10:48 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 6/22/2021 1:05 AM, Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > mips.exp does not support -fno-inline, causing the tests return
> > "ERROR:
> > Unrecognised option: -fno-inline for dg-options ... ".
> >
> > Use noinline attribute like other mip
On 6/22/2021 1:05 AM, Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches wrote:
mips.exp does not support -fno-inline, causing the tests return "ERROR:
Unrecognised option: -fno-inline for dg-options ... ".
Use noinline attribute like other mips target tests, to workaround it.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.target/mi
mips.exp does not support -fno-inline, causing the tests return "ERROR:
Unrecognised option: -fno-inline for dg-options ... ".
Use noinline attribute like other mips target tests, to workaround it.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.target/mips/cfgcleanup-jalr2.c: Remove -fno-inline and add
14 matches
Mail list logo
