On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 11:44 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 08:35 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 17:07 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > (replying to my own "[PATCH 05/41] Add -fdiagnostics-nn-line-
> > > numbers"
> > > with a followup that does it at the DejaG
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 08:35 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 17:07 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > (replying to my own "[PATCH 05/41] Add -fdiagnostics-nn-line-
> > numbers"
> > with a followup that does it at the DejaGnu level rather than as a
> > test-only option)
> >
> > On Wed, 2
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 17:07 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> (replying to my own "[PATCH 05/41] Add -fdiagnostics-nn-line-numbers"
> with a followup that does it at the DejaGnu level rather than as a
> test-only option)
>
> On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 04:02 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > I may be able to
(replying to my own "[PATCH 05/41] Add -fdiagnostics-nn-line-numbers"
with a followup that does it at the DejaGnu level rather than as a
test-only option)
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 04:02 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> I may be able to self-approve this. It's used by the diagnostic_path
> patch, and by