Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Run array54.C only for sync_int_long targets

2024-08-25 Thread Jeff Law
On 8/24/24 11:51 AM, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote: On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:16:36PM +0300, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote: The test case uses "atomic", which fails to link on pru-unknown-elf target due to missing __atomic_load_4 symbol. Fix by filtering for sync_int_long effective target. Ensured that

Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Run array54.C only for sync_int_long targets

2024-08-24 Thread Dimitar Dimitrov
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:16:36PM +0300, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote: > The test case uses "atomic", which fails to link on > pru-unknown-elf target due to missing __atomic_load_4 symbol. > > Fix by filtering for sync_int_long effective target. Ensured that the > test still passes for x86_64-pc-linux

[PATCH] testsuite: Run array54.C only for sync_int_long targets

2024-08-06 Thread Dimitar Dimitrov
The test case uses "atomic", which fails to link on pru-unknown-elf target due to missing __atomic_load_4 symbol. Fix by filtering for sync_int_long effective target. Ensured that the test still passes for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Ok for master? gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/init/array