On 8/24/24 11:51 AM, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:16:36PM +0300, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
The test case uses "atomic", which fails to link on
pru-unknown-elf target due to missing __atomic_load_4 symbol.
Fix by filtering for sync_int_long effective target. Ensured that
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:16:36PM +0300, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> The test case uses "atomic", which fails to link on
> pru-unknown-elf target due to missing __atomic_load_4 symbol.
>
> Fix by filtering for sync_int_long effective target. Ensured that the
> test still passes for x86_64-pc-linux
The test case uses "atomic", which fails to link on
pru-unknown-elf target due to missing __atomic_load_4 symbol.
Fix by filtering for sync_int_long effective target. Ensured that the
test still passes for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Ok for master?
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/init/array