On 2025-01-22 22:15, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jan 19, 2025, at 12:47 PM, Torbjorn SVENSSON
wrote:
On 2025-01-19 21:20, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 12:17 PM Torbjörn SVENSSON
wrote:
Ok for trunk?
--
Most baremetal toolchains will not have an implementation for alarm and
s
On Jan 19, 2025, at 12:47 PM, Torbjorn SVENSSON
wrote:
>
> On 2025-01-19 21:20, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 12:17 PM Torbjörn SVENSSON
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok for trunk?
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Most baremetal toolchains will not have an implementation for alarm and
>>> sigaction
On 2025-01-19 21:20, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 12:17 PM Torbjörn SVENSSON
wrote:
Ok for trunk?
--
Most baremetal toolchains will not have an implementation for alarm and
sigaction as they are target specific.
For arm-none-eabi with newlib, function signatures are expose
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 12:17 PM Torbjörn SVENSSON
wrote:
>
> Ok for trunk?
>
> --
>
> Most baremetal toolchains will not have an implementation for alarm and
> sigaction as they are target specific.
> For arm-none-eabi with newlib, function signatures are exposed, but
> there is no implmentation
Ok for trunk?
--
Most baremetal toolchains will not have an implementation for alarm and
sigaction as they are target specific.
For arm-none-eabi with newlib, function signatures are exposed, but
there is no implmentation and thus the test cases causes a undefined
symbol link error.
gcc/testsuit
