Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Introduce be/le selectors

2018-05-25 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:30:58AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 24/05/18 18:28, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:07:18AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > >> On 22/05/18 22:21, Jeff Law wrote: > >>> On 05/21/2018 03:46 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >>

Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Introduce be/le selectors

2018-05-25 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 24/05/18 18:28, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:07:18AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >> On 22/05/18 22:21, Jeff Law wrote: >>> On 05/21/2018 03:46 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: This patch creates "be" and "le" selectors, which can be used by all archite

Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Introduce be/le selectors

2018-05-24 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:07:18AM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 22/05/18 22:21, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 05/21/2018 03:46 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >> This patch creates "be" and "le" selectors, which can be used by all > >> architectures, similar to ilp32 and lp64. > >> 2017-05

Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Introduce be/le selectors

2018-05-23 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 03:21:30PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 05/21/2018 03:46 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > This patch creates "be" and "le" selectors, which can be used by all > > architectures, similar to ilp32 and lp64. > > I think this is fine. "be" "le" are used all over the place in gc

Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Introduce be/le selectors

2018-05-23 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 22/05/18 22:21, Jeff Law wrote: > On 05/21/2018 03:46 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> This patch creates "be" and "le" selectors, which can be used by all >> architectures, similar to ilp32 and lp64. >> >> Is this okay for trunk? >> >> >> Segher >> >> >> 2017-05-21 Segher Boessenkool >> >> g

Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Introduce be/le selectors

2018-05-22 Thread Jeff Law
On 05/21/2018 03:46 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > This patch creates "be" and "le" selectors, which can be used by all > architectures, similar to ilp32 and lp64. > > Is this okay for trunk? > > > Segher > > > 2017-05-21 Segher Boessenkool > > gcc/testsuite/ > * lib/target-supports

Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Introduce be/le selectors

2018-05-21 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:59:43PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote: > Hi Segher, > > > This patch creates "be" and "le" selectors, which can be used by all > > architectures, similar to ilp32 and lp64. > > > > Is this okay for trunk? > > two issues: I don't find be and le particularly expressive. Maybe

Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Introduce be/le selectors

2018-05-21 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Segher, > This patch creates "be" and "le" selectors, which can be used by all > architectures, similar to ilp32 and lp64. > > Is this okay for trunk? two issues: I don't find be and le particularly expressive. Maybe big-endian and little-endian? Besides, whatever we do, the new keywords nee

[PATCH] testsuite: Introduce be/le selectors

2018-05-21 Thread Segher Boessenkool
This patch creates "be" and "le" selectors, which can be used by all architectures, similar to ilp32 and lp64. Is this okay for trunk? Segher 2017-05-21 Segher Boessenkool gcc/testsuite/ * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_be): New. (check_effective_target_le)