> From: Richard Sandiford
> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 17:54:15 +0100
> Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches writes:
> > Tested native x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and cris-elf (non-LRA and
> > also hacked to switch to LRA).
>
> Since !LRA is hopefully not long for this world, I'd personally
> prefer to keep i
Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches writes:
> Tested native x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and cris-elf (non-LRA and
> also hacked to switch to LRA).
Since !LRA is hopefully not long for this world, I'd personally
prefer to keep it simple & obvious (at least for most targets).
There's a risk that we could lo
Tested native x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and cris-elf (non-LRA and
also hacked to switch to LRA).
Ok to commit?
--- 8< ---
The LRA target list is incomplete. Rather than syncing it with actual
LRA targets, better use existing infrastructure and look for a
LRA-specific pattern in the reload dump (which
