Hi!
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 09:41:23AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 06:56:37PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > So what is the actual error here? This whole union stuff is because we
> > *do* want proper aliasing, afaics.
>
> The reading through union is not where th
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 06:56:37PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 08:02:28PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:12:20AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > > these testcases now fails because they conta
Hi!
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 08:02:28PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:12:20AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > these testcases now fails because they contains an invalid type puning
> > > that happens via const VALUE_TYPE *v p
On January 22, 2021 8:02:28 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:12:20AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> > these testcases now fails because they contains an invalid type
>puning
>> > that happens via const VALUE_TYPE *v pointer
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:12:20AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > these testcases now fails because they contains an invalid type puning
> > that happens via const VALUE_TYPE *v pointer. Since the check function
> > is noinline, modref is needed to trigge
