Andi Kleen:
> I would rather make it XFAIL and also open a PR, after all it is a
limitation that could (and should) be fixed.
Huh, I didn't see this thread in time.
For the special case that the exception handling code in the caller is
empty - which is what mustcall3.C and mustcall5.C are testin
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 9:59 AM Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Dimitar Dimitrov writes:
>
> > A few tests started failing recently on pru-unknown-elf because it uses
> > SJLJ implementation for exceptions:
> > FAIL: g++.dg/ext/musttail3.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
> > .../gcc/gcc/testsuite/
Dimitar Dimitrov writes:
> A few tests started failing recently on pru-unknown-elf because it uses
> SJLJ implementation for exceptions:
> FAIL: g++.dg/ext/musttail3.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
> .../gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/musttail3.C:12:34: error: cannot
> tail-call: caller
A few tests started failing recently on pru-unknown-elf because it uses
SJLJ implementation for exceptions:
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/musttail3.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
.../gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/musttail3.C:12:34: error: cannot tail-call:
caller uses sjlj exceptions
Fix by disabli