On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 08:58:49AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 2:34 AM Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 2:24 PM Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> > >
> > > A few testcases were marked for avr target, which has no alignment
> > > requirement
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 2:34 AM Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 2:24 PM Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> >
> > A few testcases were marked for avr target, which has no alignment
> > requirements. But those tests in fact should filter for any
> > target having __BIGGEST_
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 2:24 PM Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
>
> A few testcases were marked for avr target, which has no alignment
> requirements. But those tests in fact should filter for any
> target having __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__=1.
>
> A new effective target check is introduced: no_alignment_constr
A few testcases were marked for avr target, which has no alignment
requirements. But those tests in fact should filter for any
target having __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__=1.
A new effective target check is introduced: no_alignment_constraints.
It checks whether __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__ is declared as 1.
Al
