On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 11:43:27AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> I do wonder with all these patches whether it would be better to
> preserve the LHS on musttail calls instead?
It can't be instead, because without musttail all those tests regress
as well (before IPA-VRP they were successfully tail
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The IPA-VRP workaround in the tailc/musttail passes was just comparing
> the singleton constant from a tail call candidate return with the ret_val.
> This unfortunately doesn't work in the following testcase, where we have
>[local count: 1522
Hi!
The IPA-VRP workaround in the tailc/musttail passes was just comparing
the singleton constant from a tail call candidate return with the ret_val.
This unfortunately doesn't work in the following testcase, where we have
[local count: 152205050]:
baz (); [must tail call]
goto ; [100.00%]
