Re: [PATCH] specify large command line option arguments (PR 82063)

2018-07-23 Thread Martin Sebor
On 07/23/2018 02:18 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 04:43:17PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote: OK with the nit fixed. IF you need to update the doc changes as a result of the -faligned-* changes, those are pre-approved. I had to adjust a few more tests and make a couple of minor

Re: [PATCH] specify large command line option arguments (PR 82063)

2018-07-23 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 04:43:17PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote: > > > > OK with the nit fixed. IF you need to update the doc changes as a > > > > result of the -faligned-* changes, those are pre-approved. > > > > > > > > > I had to adjust a few more tests and make a couple of minor > > > tweaks as

Re: [PATCH] specify large command line option arguments (PR 82063)

2018-07-22 Thread Martin Sebor
On 07/21/2018 06:42 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: On 07/19/2018 04:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 06/24/2018 03:05 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: Storing integer command line option arguments in type int limits options such as -Wlarger-than= or -Walloca-larger-

Re: [PATCH] specify large command line option arguments (PR 82063)

2018-07-21 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: > On 07/19/2018 04:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> >> On 06/24/2018 03:05 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: >>> >>> Storing integer command line option arguments in type int >>> limits options such as -Wlarger-than= or -Walloca-larger-than >>> to at most INT_MA

Re: [PATCH] specify large command line option arguments (PR 82063)

2018-07-20 Thread Martin Sebor
On 07/19/2018 04:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 06/24/2018 03:05 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: Storing integer command line option arguments in type int limits options such as -Wlarger-than= or -Walloca-larger-than to at most INT_MAX (see bug 71905). Larger values wrap around zero. The value zero is cons

Re: [PATCH] specify large command line option arguments (PR 82063)

2018-07-19 Thread Jeff Law
On 06/24/2018 03:05 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: > Storing integer command line option arguments in type int > limits options such as -Wlarger-than= or -Walloca-larger-than > to at most INT_MAX (see bug 71905).  Larger values wrap around > zero.  The value zero is considered to disable the option, > mak

PING #3 [PATCH] specify large command line option arguments (PR 82063)

2018-07-16 Thread Martin Sebor
Ping #3: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg01509.html On 07/09/2018 09:13 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: Ping #2: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg01509.html On 07/03/2018 08:12 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg01509.html On 06/24/2

PING #2 [PATCH] specify large command line option arguments (PR 82063)

2018-07-09 Thread Martin Sebor
Ping #2: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg01509.html On 07/03/2018 08:12 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg01509.html On 06/24/2018 03:05 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: Storing integer command line option arguments in type int limits options such

PING [PATCH] specify large command line option arguments (PR 82063)

2018-07-03 Thread Martin Sebor
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg01509.html On 06/24/2018 03:05 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: Storing integer command line option arguments in type int limits options such as -Wlarger-than= or -Walloca-larger-than to at most INT_MAX (see bug 71905). Larger values wrap around zero.

[PATCH] specify large command line option arguments (PR 82063)

2018-06-24 Thread Martin Sebor
Storing integer command line option arguments in type int limits options such as -Wlarger-than= or -Walloca-larger-than to at most INT_MAX (see bug 71905). Larger values wrap around zero. The value zero is considered to disable the option, making it impossible to specify a zero limit. To get ar