On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 1:13 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 12:22:10PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 11:38 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:45:37AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > OK
> > >
> > > Unfortunately I've
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 12:22:10PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 11:38 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:45:37AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > OK
> >
> > Unfortunately I've only bootstrapped/regtested it with normal checking.
> > Testing it wi
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 11:38 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:45:37AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > OK
>
> Unfortunately I've only bootstrapped/regtested it with normal checking.
> Testing it with --enable-checking=release now shows that this patch just
> moved the FAILs
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:45:37AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> OK
Unfortunately I've only bootstrapped/regtested it with normal checking.
Testing it with --enable-checking=release now shows that this patch just
moved the FAILs to a different symbol. And note that isn't even a LTO
build.
The f
