Hi!
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:58:11PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 6/9/20 9:42 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> > Excess errors:
> > cc1: error: '-fsanitize=address' is incompatible with
> > '-fsanitize=kernel-address'
>
> Sorry for that, I'm going to install the following patch.
These tests are UN
On 6/9/20 9:42 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Excess errors:
cc1: error: '-fsanitize=address' is incompatible with
'-fsanitize=kernel-address'
Sorry for that, I'm going to install the following patch.
Martin
>From 20e0cd44f9c3e9402a0cd26a0332556391902cb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Liska
D
Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches writes:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 02:32:36PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>> >From 5fe0671ad79d14d1c9d0fead1a471875a4416fac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Martin Liska
>> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:03:55 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] saniti
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 02:32:36PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> >From 5fe0671ad79d14d1c9d0fead1a471875a4416fac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Martin Liska
> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:03:55 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] sanitizer: do not inline no-sanitize into sanitizer fn
>
rom 5fe0671ad79d14d1c9d0fead1a471875a4416fac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Liska
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:03:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] sanitizer: do not inline no-sanitize into sanitizer fn
gcc/ChangeLog:
* cif-code.def (ATTRIBUTE_MISMATCH): Rename to...
(SANITIZE_ATTRIBUTE_MISMA
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 02:09:06PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> - return ((sanitize_flags_p (SANITIZE_ADDRESS, caller)
> -== sanitize_flags_p (SANITIZE_ADDRESS, callee))
> - && (sanitize_flags_p (SANITIZE_POINTER_COMPARE, caller)
> - == sanitize_flags_p (SANITIZE_POINTER_CO
00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Liska
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:03:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] sanitizer: do not inline no-sanitize into sanitizer fn
gcc/ChangeLog:
* cif-code.def (ATTRIBUTE_MISMATCH): Rename to...
(SANITIZE_ATTRIBUTE_MISMATCH): ...this.
* ipa-inline.c (sanitize_attrs_match_for_inlin
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 01:53:38PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> + const sanitize_code codes[] =
> +{
> + SANITIZE_ADDRESS,
> + SANITIZE_THREAD,
> + SANITIZE_LEAK,
Why leak? That is really a link time option only, doesn't affect code
generation in any way.
On the other side, d
Hello.
The patch is follow up of the kernel discussion:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/canpmjnnrz5ovkb6pe7k6gjfogbht_zhypkng9ad+kjndzk7...@mail.gmail.com/
The patch changes inliner in the following way:
1) do not compare caller and callee sanitizer attributes
for always_inline functions - that
