Previously we optimized expressions of the form a < 0 ? -1 : 0 to
(signed)a >> 31 during vcond expanding. Since r15-1638-gaac00d09859cc5
this is done in match.pd. The implementation in the back end as well as
in match.pd are basically the same but still distinct. For the tests in
vcond-shift.c t
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 11:58:10PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 10:31 PM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
> wrote:
> >
> > Previously we optimized expressions of the form a < 0 ? -1 : 0 to
> > (signed)a >> 31 during vcond expanding. Since r15-1741-g2ccdd0f22312a1
> > this is d
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 10:31 PM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
wrote:
>
> Previously we optimized expressions of the form a < 0 ? -1 : 0 to
> (signed)a >> 31 during vcond expanding. Since r15-1741-g2ccdd0f22312a1
> this is done in match.pd. The implementation in the back end as well as
> in match.
Previously we optimized expressions of the form a < 0 ? -1 : 0 to
(signed)a >> 31 during vcond expanding. Since r15-1741-g2ccdd0f22312a1
this is done in match.pd. The implementation in the back end as well as
in match.pd are basically the same but still distinct. For the tests in
vcond-shift.c t
