Re: [PATCH] s390: Fix unresolved iterators bhfgq and xdee

2024-07-20 Thread Andreas Krebbel
On 7/20/24 08:39, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: I'm pinging this early since I would like to make sure that it gets into 14.2 RC which is about to be done on Tuesday 23rd July. On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 04:50:29PM +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: Code attribute bhfgq is missing a

Re: [PATCH] s390: Fix unresolved iterators bhfgq and xdee

2024-07-19 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
I'm pinging this early since I would like to make sure that it gets into 14.2 RC which is about to be done on Tuesday 23rd July. On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 04:50:29PM +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > Code attribute bhfgq is missing a mapping for TF. This results in > unresolved iterators

[PATCH] s390: Fix unresolved iterators bhfgq and xdee

2024-07-16 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
Code attribute bhfgq is missing a mapping for TF. This results in unresolved iterators in assembler templates for *bswaptf. With the TF mapping added the base mnemonics vlbr and vstbr are not "used" anymore but only the extended mnemonics (vlbr was interpreted as vlbr; likewise for vstbr). There

Re: [PATCH] s390: Fix unresolved iterators bhfgq and xdee

2024-07-16 Thread Andreas Krebbel
On 7/16/24 10:29, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: Code attribute bhfgq is missing a mapping for TF. This results in unresolved iterators in assembler templates for *bswaptf. With the TF mapping added the base mnemonics vlbr and vstbr are not "used" anymore but only the extended mnemonics (

[PATCH] s390: Fix unresolved iterators bhfgq and xdee

2024-07-16 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
Code attribute bhfgq is missing a mapping for TF. This results in unresolved iterators in assembler templates for *bswaptf. With the TF mapping added the base mnemonics vlbr and vstbr are not "used" anymore but only the extended mnemonics (vlbr was interpreted as vlbr; likewise for vstbr). There