Richard Biener writes:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 1:03 PM Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> While testing a later patch, I found that create_degenerate_phi
>> had an inverted test for bitmap_set_bit. It was assuming that
>> the return value was the previous bit value, rather than a
>> "something c
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 2:16 PM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 1:03 PM Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> While testing a later patch, I found that create_degenerate_phi
> >> had an inverted test for bitmap_set_bit. It was assuming that
> >>
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 1:03 PM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> While testing a later patch, I found that create_degenerate_phi
> had an inverted test for bitmap_set_bit. It was assuming that
> the return value was the previous bit value, rather than a
> "something changed" value. :(
>
> Also, the c
While testing a later patch, I found that create_degenerate_phi
had an inverted test for bitmap_set_bit. It was assuming that
the return value was the previous bit value, rather than a
"something changed" value. :(
Also, the call to add_live_out_use shouldn't be conditional
on the DF_LR_OUT opera