On 7/25/23 09:40, Richard Biener wrote:
The following removes the code checking whether a noop copy
is between something involved in the return sequence composed
of a SET and USE. Instead of checking for this special-case
the following makes us only ever remove noop copies between
pseudos - wh
On 7/31/23 04:53, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023, Richard Biener wrote:
The following removes the code checking whether a noop copy
is between something involved in the return sequence composed
of a SET and USE. Instead of checking for this special-case
the follow
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023, Richard Biener wrote:
> The following removes the code checking whether a noop copy
> is between something involved in the return sequence composed
> of a SET and USE. Instead of checking for this special-case
> the following makes us only ever remove noop copies between
> ps
The following removes the code checking whether a noop copy
is between something involved in the return sequence composed
of a SET and USE. Instead of checking for this special-case
the following makes us only ever remove noop copies between
pseudos - which is the case that is necessary for IRA/LR
