Re: [PATCH] rs6000: unnecessary clear after vctzlsbb in vec_first_match_or_eos_index

Hi Ajit, on 2023/8/31 18:44, Ajit Agarwal via Gcc-patches wrote: > > This patch removes zero extension from vctzlsbb as it already zero extends. > Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64-linux-gnu. > > Thanks & Regards > Ajit > > rs6000: unnecessary clear after vctzlsbb in vec_first_match_or_eo

[PING ^0] [PATCH] rs6000: unnecessary clear after vctzlsbb in vec_first_match_or_eos_index

Ping! Forwarded Message Subject: [PATCH] rs6000: unnecessary clear after vctzlsbb in vec_first_match_or_eos_index Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 16:14:46 +0530 From: Ajit Agarwal via Gcc-patches Reply-To: Ajit Agarwal To: gcc-patches CC: Peter Bergner , Segher Boessenkool This

[PATCH] rs6000: unnecessary clear after vctzlsbb in vec_first_match_or_eos_index

This patch removes zero extension from vctzlsbb as it already zero extends. Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64-linux-gnu. Thanks & Regards Ajit rs6000: unnecessary clear after vctzlsbb in vec_first_match_or_eos_index For rs6000 target we dont need zero_extend after vctzlsbb as vctzlsbb alre

[PATCH] rs6000: unnecessary clear after vctzlsbb in vec_first_match_or_eos_index

This patch removes zero extension from vctzlsbb as it already zero extends. Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64-linux-gnu. Thanks & Regards Ajit rs6000: unnecessary clear after vctzlsbb in vec_first_match_or_eos_index For rs6000 target we dont need zero_extend after vctzlsbb as vctzlsbb al