On 12/2/21 5:15 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> Tested on powerpc64le*-linux with no regressions. Ok for mainline?
>
> What can "*" be there other than the empty string? Which valuse of "*"
> did you test? :-)
Heh, too used to typing powerpc64*-linux. Yeah, in this case * == "".
> Okay fo
Hi!
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 04:12:08PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> This patch adds a new effective-target function that tests whether
> it is safe to emit the ROP-protect instructions and updates the
> ROP test cases to use it.
>
> Segher, as we discussed offline, this uses the double [] which
I'd like to ping the following patch.
The test case in the previously OK'd fix for PR101324 depends on this change,
so I've had to hold off committing it until this is in. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/584208.html
Peter
Message-ID:
This patch adds a new
This patch adds a new effective-target function that tests whether
it is safe to emit the ROP-protect instructions and updates the
ROP test cases to use it.
Segher, as we discussed offline, this uses the double [] which you said
isn't needed in general regex's, but for some reason is needed in the
