Hi!
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 09:44:58AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> This breaks quite some powerpc.exp tests. Right now VEC_COND_EXPR expects
> first
> argument to be a SSA_NAME (or constant) and so the patch fixes that.
What does this mean? All context is missing here.
Also, is expecting that
Hi.
This breaks quite some powerpc.exp tests. Right now VEC_COND_EXPR expects first
argument to be a SSA_NAME (or constant) and so the patch fixes that.
Using the patch, I survive powerpc.exp test-suite.
Ready for master?
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c (fold_build_