Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Improve .machine

2022-06-20 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 09:48:34AM +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 04/04/2022 11:31, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >Hello Segher, > > > >On 15/03/2022 23:29, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >>On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 03:29:23PM +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >>>now that the PR104829 is fixed could I back

Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Improve .machine

2022-06-20 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 04/04/2022 11:31, Sebastian Huber wrote: Hello Segher, On 15/03/2022 23:29, Segher Boessenkool wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 03:29:23PM +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote: now that the PR104829 is fixed could I back port Segher Boessenkool (2):    rs6000: Improve .machine    rs6000: Do not use

Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Improve .machine

2022-04-04 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Segher, On 15/03/2022 23:29, Segher Boessenkool wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 03:29:23PM +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote: now that the PR104829 is fixed could I back port Segher Boessenkool (2): rs6000: Improve .machine rs6000: Do not use rs6000_cpu for .machine ppc and ppc64 (PR1048

Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Improve .machine

2022-03-15 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 03:29:23PM +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote: > now that the PR104829 is fixed could I back port > > Segher Boessenkool (2): > rs6000: Improve .machine > rs6000: Do not use rs6000_cpu for .machine ppc and ppc64 (PR104829) > > to GCC 10 and 11? I will do it, in a few d

Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Improve .machine

2022-03-15 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Segher, On 10/03/2022 11:11, Segher Boessenkool wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 09:25:21AM +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 04/03/2022 17:51, Segher Boessenkool wrote: This adds more correct .machine for most older CPUs. It should be conservative in the sense that everything we handled b

Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Improve .machine

2022-03-10 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 09:25:21AM +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 04/03/2022 17:51, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >This adds more correct .machine for most older CPUs. It should be > >conservative in the sense that everything we handled before we handle at > >least as well now. This does n

Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Improve .machine

2022-03-10 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 04/03/2022 17:51, Segher Boessenkool wrote: Hi! This adds more correct .machine for most older CPUs. It should be conservative in the sense that everything we handled before we handle at least as well now. This does not yet revamp the server CPU handling, it is too risky at this point in ti

Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Improve .machine

2022-03-07 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 08:53:42PM +, Joseph Myers wrote: > This breaks the build of libgcc for powerpc-linux-gnu (32-bit, default > CPU; configured --disable-multilib --enable-secureplt). > > cc1: warning: The '-mfloat128' option may not be fully supported > /tmp/ccHCPzSh.s: Assembler messag

Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Improve .machine

2022-03-07 Thread Joseph Myers
This breaks the build of libgcc for powerpc-linux-gnu (32-bit, default CPU; configured --disable-multilib --enable-secureplt). cc1: warning: The '-mfloat128' option may not be fully supported /tmp/ccHCPzSh.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccHCPzSh.s:163: Error: unrecognized opcode: `lfiwzx' /scratch/j

[PATCH] rs6000: Improve .machine

2022-03-04 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! This adds more correct .machine for most older CPUs. It should be conservative in the sense that everything we handled before we handle at least as well now. This does not yet revamp the server CPU handling, it is too risky at this point in time. Tested on powerpc64-linux {-m32,-m64}. Also