On 8/6/20 10:29 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 8/5/20 6:06 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Ok, updated patch pushed to trunk. I'll push to GCC10 after a day or two.
And now pushed to GCC 10.
Peter
On 8/5/20 6:06 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> You can just say
>
>&& reload_completed
>&& !(fpr_reg_operand (operands[0], PXImode) && operands[1] == const0_rtx)
>
> afaics?
Agreed. I made that change and retested which was clean.
> Okay (for trunk, and later 10) with or without such
Hi!
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 02:02:36PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> The following patch fixes one of the bugs discovered in PR96466, namely
> when we spill an accumulator that has a known zero value. In that case,
> LRA would emit a new (set (reg:PXI ...) 0) insn, but it would not use the
> mma_
On 8/5/20 2:02 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> This patch fixes the ICE and is in the middle of regression testing.
> Ok for trunk if the testing comes back clean?
Testing was clean with no regressions.
Peter
The following patch fixes one of the bugs discovered in PR96466, namely
when we spill an accumulator that has a known zero value. In that case,
LRA would emit a new (set (reg:PXI ...) 0) insn, but it would not use the
mma_xxsetaccz pattern to do it. The solution is to move the xxsetaccz
instructi
