Hi!
On 11/18/21 10:22 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:09:53AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi! This patch is broken out from the test case patch for the new builtins
>> support.
>>
>> The old builtins code performs gimple folding on 128-bit compares. This
>> results
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:09:53AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Hi! This patch is broken out from the test case patch for the new builtins
> support.
>
> The old builtins code performs gimple folding on 128-bit compares. This
> results in correct but very inefficient code. (I suspect we may be
Hi! This patch is broken out from the test case patch for the new builtins
support.
The old builtins code performs gimple folding on 128-bit compares. This
results in correct but very inefficient code. (I suspect we may be
missing some optab entries, misleading gimple into 64-bit emulation.)