On 18/07/25 2:09 am, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> So, how do you resolve it in this backport, simply leaving out those
> hunks?
>
> If so: okay for 14. You don't want to backport further, right? More
> stuff becomes missing :-)
Yes, We need to ignore those patterns in this backport!
Thanks,
Kis
Hi!
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 11:16:07AM +0530, Kishan Parmar wrote:
> I would like to backport patch r15-2928-gbf891fcabca7a5 which is
> available from GCC-15.
>
> In general, if -mcpu=power9, float128 hardware is available, but in the
> case the user explicitly does -mno-float128-hardware or runs
I would like to backport patch r15-2928-gbf891fcabca7a5 which is
available from GCC-15.
In general, if -mcpu=power9, float128 hardware is available, but in the
case the user explicitly does -mno-float128-hardware or runs on a machine
that doesn't enable float128 by default (i.e. big endian Linux a