Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Backport r15-2928-gbf891fcabca7a5 to gcc-14

2025-07-17 Thread Kishan Parmar
On 18/07/25 2:09 am, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > So, how do you resolve it in this backport, simply leaving out those > hunks? > > If so: okay for 14. You don't want to backport further, right? More > stuff becomes missing :-) Yes, We need to ignore those patterns in this backport! Thanks, Kis

Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Backport r15-2928-gbf891fcabca7a5 to gcc-14

2025-07-17 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 11:16:07AM +0530, Kishan Parmar wrote: > I would like to backport patch r15-2928-gbf891fcabca7a5 which is > available from GCC-15. > > In general, if -mcpu=power9, float128 hardware is available, but in the > case the user explicitly does -mno-float128-hardware or runs

[PATCH] rs6000: Backport r15-2928-gbf891fcabca7a5 to gcc-14

2025-07-16 Thread Kishan Parmar
I would like to backport patch r15-2928-gbf891fcabca7a5 which is available from GCC-15. In general, if -mcpu=power9, float128 hardware is available, but in the case the user explicitly does -mno-float128-hardware or runs on a machine that doesn't enable float128 by default (i.e. big endian Linux a