On 9/16/20 12:09 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 08:36:35AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
This is a cleanup requested by Segher in a previous review. Most
uses of rs6000_pcrel_p are called for the current function. A
specialized version for cfun is more efficient for these u
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 08:36:35AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> This is a cleanup requested by Segher in a previous review. Most
> uses of rs6000_pcrel_p are called for the current function. A
> specialized version for cfun is more efficient for these uses.
Then rename that one to rs6000_functio
This is a cleanup requested by Segher in a previous review. Most
uses of rs6000_pcrel_p are called for the current function. A
specialized version for cfun is more efficient for these uses.
(Actually all uses are called for the current function, so now
rs6000_pcrel_p is an orphan. However, I th
