Hi!
on 2022/7/22 09:02, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 08:41:43AM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> Hi Segher,
>>
>> Thanks for the comments!
>
> Always.
>
This patch is to fix empty TUs with one dummy variable definition
accordingly.
>>>
>>> You can also use
>>>
Hi!
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 08:41:43AM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> Hi Segher,
>
> Thanks for the comments!
Always.
> >> This patch is to fix empty TUs with one dummy variable definition
> >> accordingly.
> >
> > You can also use
> > enum{a};
> > which is shorter, but more importantly does not
Hi Segher,
Thanks for the comments!
on 2022/7/22 06:09, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 05:32:01PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> As the failure of test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9-.c in
>> PR106345 shows, some test sources for some powerpc effective
>> targets use empty tr
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 05:32:01PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> As the failure of test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9-.c in
> PR106345 shows, some test sources for some powerpc effective
> targets use empty translation unit wrongly. The test sources
> could go with options like "-ansi -pedantic-e
Hi,
As the failure of test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9-.c in
PR106345 shows, some test sources for some powerpc effective
targets use empty translation unit wrongly. The test sources
could go with options like "-ansi -pedantic-errors", then those
effective target checkings will fail unexpe
