On 1/5/19 2:41 PM, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
Hi Martin,
The patch on top of r267591 fixes pr88638 without regression.
Note
FAIL: c-c++-common/attributes-4.c -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/attributes-4.c -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-commo
On 1/6/19 4:34 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Attached is an updated patch with the wording change to the manual
> discussed below and rebased on the top of today's trunk.
>
> Martin
>
> PS Thanks for the additional info, Iain.
>
> On 1/5/19 10:53 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>
>>> On 5 Jan 2019, at 17:39
> On 6 Jan 2019, at 23:34, Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> Attached is an updated patch with the wording change to the manual
> discussed below and rebased on the top of today's trunk.
Works for me as well.
thanks for the patch.
Iain
>
> Martin
>
> PS Thanks for the additional info, Iain.
>
> On
Attached is an updated patch with the wording change to the manual
discussed below and rebased on the top of today's trunk.
Martin
PS Thanks for the additional info, Iain.
On 1/5/19 10:53 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
On 5 Jan 2019, at 17:39, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 1/5/19 3:31 AM, Iain Sandoe wro
Hi Martin,
The patch on top of r267591 fixes pr88638 without regression.
Note
FAIL: c-c++-common/attributes-4.c -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/attributes-4.c -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/attributes-4.c -std=gnu++98 (test for excess erro
> On 5 Jan 2019, at 17:39, Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 1/5/19 3:31 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>>> On 4 Jan 2019, at 22:30, Mike Stump wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jan 4, 2019, at 2:03 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The improved handling of attribute positional arguments added
in r2661
On 1/5/19 3:31 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi Martin,
On 4 Jan 2019, at 22:30, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jan 4, 2019, at 2:03 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The improved handling of attribute positional arguments added
in r266195 introduced a regression on Darwin where attribute
format with the CFString ar
Hi Martin,
> On 4 Jan 2019, at 22:30, Mike Stump wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2019, at 2:03 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>
>> The improved handling of attribute positional arguments added
>> in r266195 introduced a regression on Darwin where attribute
>> format with the CFString archetype accepts CFString
On Jan 4, 2019, at 2:03 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> The improved handling of attribute positional arguments added
> in r266195 introduced a regression on Darwin where attribute
> format with the CFString archetype accepts CFString* parameter
> types in positions where only char* would otherwise b
The improved handling of attribute positional arguments added
in r266195 introduced a regression on Darwin where attribute
format with the CFString archetype accepts CFString* parameter
types in positions where only char* would otherwise be allowed.
This is specific to Darwin so it didn't show up
10 matches
Mail list logo
