On 03/11/15 15:37, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 06:49:20AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 11/03/2015 04:31 AM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
>>> From: Trevor Saunders
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> $subject, nothing refers to this header so we might as well remove it.
>>>
>>> tested I ca
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 06:49:20AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/03/2015 04:31 AM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
> >From: Trevor Saunders
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >$subject, nothing refers to this header so we might as well remove it.
> >
> >tested I can still build on x86_64-linux-gnu, not that I wou
On 03/11/15 13:49, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/03/2015 04:31 AM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
>> From: Trevor Saunders
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> $subject, nothing refers to this header so we might as well remove it.
>>
>> tested I can still build on x86_64-linux-gnu, not that I would expect
>> anything
>> e
On 11/03/2015 04:31 AM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders
Hi,
$subject, nothing refers to this header so we might as well remove it.
tested I can still build on x86_64-linux-gnu, not that I would expect anything
else or that it is particularly relevent, ok?
Trev
gcc/Cha
On 03/11/15 11:31, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
> From: Trevor Saunders
>
> Hi,
>
> $subject, nothing refers to this header so we might as well remove it.
>
> tested I can still build on x86_64-linux-gnu, not that I would expect anything
> else or that it is particularly relevent, ok?
>
O
From: Trevor Saunders
Hi,
$subject, nothing refers to this header so we might as well remove it.
tested I can still build on x86_64-linux-gnu, not that I would expect anything
else or that it is particularly relevent, ok?
Trev
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-11-03 Trevor Saunders
* config/ar
