On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:43:46PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Nice clean-up :-)
>
> tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org writes:
> > @@ -2248,11 +2249,14 @@ process_define_subst (void)
> > static void
> > rtx_handle_directive (int lineno, const char *rtx_name)
> > {
> > - rtx queue, x;
> > + auto
Nice clean-up :-)
tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org writes:
> @@ -2248,11 +2249,14 @@ process_define_subst (void)
> static void
> rtx_handle_directive (int lineno, const char *rtx_name)
> {
> - rtx queue, x;
> + auto_vec subrtxs;
> + if (!read_rtx (rtx_name, &subrtxs))
> +return;
Very minor, bu
From: Trevor Saunders
Hi,
It seems much simpler for read_rtx to just add rtxs to a vector than to deal
with a bunch of expr list rtxen.
bootstrapped + regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu, ok?
Trev
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-07-12 Trevor Saunders
* gensupport.c (rtx_handle_directive): Adjust.
