On 4/18/23 08:12, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 07:43:41 -0600
From: Jeff Law
On 2/15/23 08:34, Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches wrote:
Regtested cris-elf with its LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS
disabled, where it regresses gcc.target/cris/rld-legit1.c;
as expected, becaus
> That "supposed to" is only *one* possible implementation.
> The one in CRIS - and I believe the preferred one; one I
> should advocate more - is to *always* expose clobbering of
> the flags.
Yes, both approaches are acceptable IMO and should work.
--
Eric Botcazou
> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 07:43:41 -0600
> From: Jeff Law
> On 2/15/23 08:34, Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Regtested cris-elf with its LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS
> > disabled, where it regresses gcc.target/cris/rld-legit1.c;
> > as expected, because that test guards proper function
On 2/15/23 08:34, Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches wrote:
Regtested cris-elf with its LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS
disabled, where it regresses gcc.target/cris/rld-legit1.c;
as expected, because that test guards proper function of its
LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS i.e., that there's no sign of
deco
Regtested cris-elf with its LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS
disabled, where it regresses gcc.target/cris/rld-legit1.c;
as expected, because that test guards proper function of its
LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS i.e., that there's no sign of
decomposed address elements.
LRA also causes a similar decomposition
