Hi Mark,
> > I double-checked the GCC internals manual and all it says is:
> >
> > There files are generated from the '.opt' files and the generated
> > HTML documentation by 'regenerate-opt-urls.py', and should be
> > regenerated when adding new options, via manually invoking 'mak
Hi Maciej,
On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 04:54:06PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
> > > Hence we decided to check for it in CI instead.
> > >
> > > Hope the trade-off sounds reasonable
> >
> > I have reviewed the thread referred and I note that a c
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > Hence we decided to check for it in CI instead.
> >
> > Hope the trade-off sounds reasonable
>
> I have reviewed the thread referred and I note that a concern such as
> mine has already been raised in response to which you have added the
> `re
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Thank you for fixing this up. Is this a new requirement now for
> > .opt
> > file changes?
>
> Yes, as of GCC 14.
>
> I posted the objectives here:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/636060.html
Thank you for the pointer.
On Mon, 2024-06-03 at 11:30 +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Tue, 28 May 2024, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> > I've pushed this to gcc trunk as r15-872-g7cc529fe514cc6 (having
> > bootstrapped and lightly tested it on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
>
> Thank you for fixing this up. Is this a new requireme
On Tue, 28 May 2024, David Malcolm wrote:
> I've pushed this to gcc trunk as r15-872-g7cc529fe514cc6 (having
> bootstrapped and lightly tested it on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Thank you for fixing this up. Is this a new requirement now for .opt
file changes? Why does it have to be called by hand th
On Tue, 2024-05-28 at 11:41 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-05-28 at 15:03 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Hi Maciej (Hi David, added to CC),
>
> > On Mon, 2024-05-27 at 05:19 +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > > As reported in PR target/79646 and fixed by a change proposed by
> > >
> On Tue, 2024-05-28 at 15:03 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Maciej (Hi David, added to CC),
>On Mon, 2024-05-27 at 05:19 +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > As reported in PR target/79646 and fixed by a change proposed by
> > Abe we
> > have a couple of issues with the descriptions of the VAX
