On 4/1/23 09:39, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 01:28:35PM +0200, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Ok for trunk if this passes bootstrap/regtest?
LGTM
Unfortunately I ran into 4 tests where we run into the known bug
where if ranger finds out a range of some floating point operation
it
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 01:28:35PM +0200, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > Ok for trunk if this passes bootstrap/regtest?
>
> LGTM
Unfortunately I ran into 4 tests where we run into the known bug
where if ranger finds out a range of some floating point operation
it folds it and throws away the trapping
On 3/31/23 12:45, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 09:57:54AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
and so if maybe_isnan, they always return [0, 1]. Now, thinking about it,
this is unnecessary pessimization, for the case where the ... block
returns range_false (type) we ac
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 09:57:54AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> and so if maybe_isnan, they always return [0, 1]. Now, thinking about it,
> this is unnecessary pessimization, for the case where the ... block
> returns range_false (type) we actually could do it also if maybe_isnan
