On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 14:47 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/21/2016 10:27 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Thanks. I attemped to use those fields of recog_data, but it
> > doesn't
> > seem to be exactly what's needed here.
>
> Yeah, I may have been confused. I'm not sure that just looking at
> SC
On 10/21/2016 10:27 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
Thanks. I attemped to use those fields of recog_data, but it doesn't
seem to be exactly what's needed here.
Yeah, I may have been confused. I'm not sure that just looking at
SCRATCHes is the right thing either, but I think you're on the right
trac
On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 11:22 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > Recognizing by SCRATCH wouldn't catch everything, I believe. You
> > should
> > be able to check n_dups and dup_loc in recog_data to identify cases
> > where you need to ensure something is restored with pointer
> > equality.
Thanks. I a